Honest Anarchist: On being bullied (personal blog)

The Daily Crust

In the days of yore, the daily crust meant survival. On nutritional par with gruel, these chunks of stale bread offered the minimum sustenance peasants could consume and still live to toil another day in the satanic mills. In the 21st century, exploding waistlines and exponential chin growth bear witness that the lack of food for the body is seldom an issue. Instead, a spectre is haunting the world: sustenance for the mind is needed. Through the use of cartoons and commentaries about current events, Honest Anarchist hopes to provide the minimum amount of Daily Crust for a starving body politik.

On being bullied (personal blog)

I hear the distinctive sound of someone running full-bore. Curiously, the sound disappears but is unaccompanied by the requisite skid that comes with stopping.

A foot -- the business-end of a flying Tae Kwon Do kick -- lands dead-center in my back. I stumble forward, barely managing to stay on my feet.

“Very funny, Larry.”

I had now joined the laundry-list of unfortunate pubescents to be bullied by Larry. I incurred his wrath because Chuck, my theretofore alleged best friend, earlier told Larry that I said he was “a dick and would not pay me back” if I loaned him money for lunch. Nothing could have been further from the truth. Even if I thought he was a dick I certainly would not tell anyone, especially Chuck. I chose not to loan money to Larry because I needed the money for Christmas, which was right around the corner. I explained to Larry my side of the misunderstanding.

Never one to believe the truth if it got in the way of a friendly thrashing, Larry followed me into the locker room and resumed his barrage. Chuck's deranged laughter only fueled Larry's frenzy.

Larry backed me against a wall and unleashed a torrent of roundhouse kicks with his right foot. From that time in the 4th grade when I beat the kim chee out of Jeoung for getting into my desk and breaking my pencils, I had always stood my ground against those who sought to impose upon me their pecking order. But Larry was no meek Korean immigrant; he was the Nelson Muntz of Rancho. The angry son of a dead mother, a lost dweller in the Martial World, Larry was believed to be the only student in my high school legally old enough to drink. I sure as hell did not want to fight the guy. That said, I did not sit idly by and take an ass beating.

For every kick he delivered I stepped in from my right-neutral stance and jammed the kick by lifting my left leg, thereby taking a knee to the side of my quadriceps. After countless strikes Larry tired from tenderizing my thigh. He walked away, never to bully me again.

The bruising and numbness were so bad the day after the initial incident I thought I should go to the hospital. Two days later my friend and I went to see “Commando.” We walked a couple of miles to the theatre, me hobbling on my black-and-blue drumstick. My friend paid for everything: movie tickets, popcorn and drinks. That was the nicest Larry had ever been to me -- perhaps out of guilt, perhaps out of respect. Perhaps out of schizophrenia. We never discussed his bullying of me and my standing up to him (such that it was). Our friendship soon drifted apart.

Years later, after high school and well into adulthood, I crossed paths with Larry when I was shopping at his place of employment: the local gun store.

No comments:

Bait and Switch (in progress)

Apologize for bait and switch to those who were expecting a true anarchist site, instead of libertarian.

For reasons that will be fleshed out in blog posts, HA waivers between Anarchist and libertarian. Want to be libertarian philosophically, but politician push me to anarchy. Every law or new tax.
Politican cannot have power to redistribute income in a democracy, will alway be abused. will invariably trade public money for votes and campaign contributions, often at the expense of class divisions.
This is a play on the confusion or purposeful misbranding of libertarians as anarchists. The classic strawman

Honest Anarchist's Rule of Four

1) Government is force.

2) Force shall not be introduced into a relationship except in self-defense.

3) No one shall deprive another of what is rightfully his or hers ("rightfully" means he or she created, wrote, filmed, drew, earned, invented, discovered, grew, purchased, inherited, bartered for, or otherwise obtained from theretofore rightful owner without theft, force or fraud).

4) I am not my brother's keeper; nor is he mine. This means people should be free to succeed or fail on own merit and free to help or not help others succeed.

Definitions:

The meanings of words or phrases as understood and used by Honest Anarchist. This meaning may be inconsistent with others' definitions, hence Honest's pre-emptive attempt to clarify. It is not an attempt to obfuscate but rather to reach a common springboard from which to launch or understand the debate. Despite any inconsistencies, the definitions should fall within what's considered an acceptable usage, even if archaic. Some words are coined by Honest and are likely not to be defined elsewhere (ex. Dictocracy). Unless Honest's meanings are so egregiously incorrect as to make his arguments incoherent, please assume the usage for the argument's sake. That said, Honest welcomes comments on corrections and will redefine any term should he be convinced its usage is incorrect or highly misleading or should the new definition be more concise.

Anarchy, Anarchism:

a philosophy which advocates no government. A condition where no central government or ruling authority exists. Anarchy rarely occurs, as ruling authorities -- also called Strongmen -- invariably rise up, even if at the family or clan level. As such, anarchy can be understood as a relative value. For example, a contigious geographic area, say, an island, without a central government can be said to be in a state of anarchy when viewed at the macro level. When viewed at the micro level it is revealed there are ruling authorities at the tribe level: tribal chiefs: The tribes would not be anarchistic within, but the relationships among tribes would be. This is why international relations are considered anarchistic. There is no higher authority than the nation-state to enforce laws, only mob (consensus) rule. Often used synomously with chaos, although they are not completely interchangeable. Also called a Hobbesian State-of-Nature (although, again, not completely synonomous). Anarchists often advocate Natural Rights theories, which maintain that humans have inherent rights (usually the right to life and its logical corollaries, the rights to: self defense against threats to person or property, freedom of movement to seek food and shelter, the fruits of one's own labor, etc.). Not to be confused with the masked hoodlums who riot against capitalism and claim to be anarchists. Many of these are what I call left-wing anarchists -- socialists. Peel back the layers of these "anarchists" and that is usually what is found.

Dictocracy:

A Statist political-economy where the government's institutions have been captured by private interests (unions, corporations, lobbyists, etc.) bribing it to take a leading role in citizens' lives; only made possible because utopian- and corrupt politicians have devolved democracy into mob rule allowing voters access to areas once forbidden: the private economic affairs of others; self-justifies because it is a "democracy"; inherently corrupt and thus highly subject to graft. Dictocrat: Not limited to bureaucrats, one who advocates or enables a dictocracy.

Libertarian(ism):

The political philosophy that force shall only be used in self defense against an immediate threat. Such a principle of the non-initiation of the use of force prevents government from engaging in the regulation of most -- if not all -- economic affairs: since government is by its nature force, and economic relations in a free-market do not inherently use force, government has no business entering into the relationship between consenting individuals. Consistent with the philosophy would be the abolition of victimless-crime laws (prostitution, drug possession, gambling). A government run under such principle would concentrate on preventing harm (likely its sole purpose) and not on doing good. Very similar to Ayn Rand's Objectivism, if not in the articulation of the principles then in the application of them (although Ayn Rand herself would disagree vehemently).

Placemen:

Generic for Bureaucrats. Members of the public sector, often unionized. The true measure of a Placeman is whether his position creates any wealth or adds any value and therefore exists in the private sector or would exist had the function not been usurped by the State. For example, education, police, and fire services: the members aren't neccesarily Placemen because but for State intervention they might be in private industry. However, poorly performing members of this exception can be properly called Placemen, as can traffic cops who set speed traps in non-residential areas. Most people have worked with the private-sector's counterpart to the Placeman, the Paycheck (who is oftentimes related to the owner). IRS and DEA agents, members of the NLRB and most -- if not all -- bureaucrats in administrative agencies and cabinet positions can be called Placemen. Not limited to government workers but also private-sector workers that receive State subsidies instead of competing in the open, honest marketplace. Not synonomous with a Statist. Closer in meaning to a Dictocrat. What seperates the Placemen is the Placemen is driven by compensation, not philosophy. The placeman gains financially, where a Statist or Dictocrat might not.

State:

When used with a capital S (State), generic for nation, state, county, perfecture, province or any other institution or institutional representative (cop, fed, etc.) that has monopoly on the use of force and is recognized by a large enough portion of society to be considered legitimate. Without a qualifier or context suggesting otherwise, typically means nation-state. When used lower-case (state) means state, proper.

State-of-Nature:

Coined by Thomas Hobbes. A historical era prior to the evolution of extended-orders (of social arrangement; i.e., economies, villages, fiefdoms, etc.). A condition of (quasi) anarchy with no formally recognized ruling authority, characterized by a struggle for resources between inhabitants of an area. Life was often brutish, with Strongmen and tribes lording over others. People maintained Natural Right to Life (and all its logical corollaries: the right to self defense, the right to seek food, shelter, a mate) although this right was not formally recognized as such. People in a SON joined together for mutual benefit and collective self-defense. Not synomous with anarchy, however. Groups can form under central control, but this does not extend beyond the clan or tribe level. (Orders more extended than this move humankind out of the State-of-Nature). Civil Society can devolve into a State-of-Nature, and States-of-Nature can exist today in remote areas that, while they may be formally under control of government, are not under practical control and won't be for any time in near future. For example, both Gilligan's island and the island in Lord of the Flies are examples of States-of-Nature occuring in modern times.

Statist(ism):

Used with an upper-case S. Including -- but not limited to -- despots, dictators, and democrats, one who advocates government (the State) take a leading role in the individual's life. There are degrees of Statism: some believe in more economic control versus social control. Statist regimes can be theocratic (Iran) or atheist (Soviet Union). Although often used generically to lump together what is considered the political Left (democrats, socialists, greens, Marxism and its derivatives...) it applies to many latter-day republican. The Statist distrusts initiative, capitalism, selfish interests, and individuals in general. The individual is subborned to the Collective. The State's primary interest is not to protect its citizens from transgression by others but to protect them largely from themselves and from the forces of nature (i.e., the need for food, shelter). Adherents believe that government should not limit itself to preventing harm but should actively do good. The State thus defines the good, with individual wants and ends concomitantly decided. To this end meaningless words and phrases like Social Justice, Fair, and the Common Good become staples in their war-chest of propaganda. The Statist political-economies often have large bodies of law devoted to victimless crimes: antitrust and labor laws; prohibitions against drugs, prostitution, and gambling, etc., although these can vary widely by regime. Citizens are usually highly taxed, with the wealthy paying more, to fund myriad State institutions (except in extractive- and petrol-States,i.e., Saudi Arabia, Iran). Depending on degree of Statism, private social institutions are eliminated entirely or usurped by those State-run. Statist leaders often manufacture enemies in order to rally citizens behind a common threat. They also have little repect, if any, for private property rights, as these are often sacrificed in the name of the People or in the application of civil rights and labor laws. Statism occurs on a scale. The null side sees anarchy: no government, often called the Hobbesian State-of-Nature. The opposite end sees totalitarianism: absolute subserviance to the State (Maoism, Stalinism, National Socialism, current-day North Korea). Because the term is so encompassing Honest Anarchist prefers to use it when discussing advocates of big government. This allows him to focus on principles of arguments versus minor details. For example, one might object to him calling President Obama a socialist. Rather than split hairs and detract from the debate, Anarchist will instead call him a Statist. There is little difference in substance, but the latter option allows Anarchist to forego proving that Obama fulfills the myriad criteria that comprise a socialist.

Suggestions for comments

Honest Anarchist encourages comments. However, if one is going to criticize, please respect the marketplace of ideas by specifically addressing Honest's arguments. No strawmen. In fact, quoting Honest is recommended when rebutting, as this allows any subsequent readers to narrow their focus with respect to the points of contention between Honest and his critics.

Same holds for insults. If Honest must be subjected to reading an insult that will live forever in cyberspace, he believes one should have the common decency to offer a reason for it. For example: "you're a facsist pig because you espouse free-market economic policies"; or," you're racist because you believe affirmative action is discrimination"; or, "you suck butt the way you drew Julian Assange wizzin' on an American flag." This helps Honest reevaluate principles in his never-ending quest for self-improvement and enlightenment.

Honest is not asking those who comment to do anything contrary to his argumentative philosophy. He attempts to address points one at a time and relishes using his intellectual-adversaries' own words against them (see, for example, the cartoons "Arnold feels good" and "Hot-air Obama"). Honest asks for the same courtesy.

Thank you for feedback.

Honest Anarchist

The Daily Crust

On being bullied (personal blog)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Pages

Total Pageviews